Navigate / search

Movie Review: Funny People (2009)

Judd Apatow’s Funny People is not so much a comedy about funny people as it is an aggressive war against stereotypes. The two most prominently attacked: That comedians are funny in “real” life, all the time, 24/7; and that everybody who survives cancer has this miraculous, dramatic, It’s a Wonderful Life/A Christmas Carol turnaround, wherein the misanthropic hero’s heart grows three sizes, the Christmas bird is put on the table, and he’s going to live a better life, dammit.

George Simmons (Adam Sandler) is not a good person. You could, if you wanted to, draw a comparison between him and C.F. Kane. Both live alone in their huge houses, interacting mainly with staff. Both have many acquaintances and business associates, but no friends. Both have gained an incredible amount of wealth, material and monetary. Both seem destined to die alone and misunderstood. Simmons, unlike Kane, is woken up from his long nightmare by a sudden revelation: He has cancer. Worse: It’s a cancer that only eight percent of people survive.

George is distraught, as are most people who are told that they have an eight percent chance of coming out of treatment alive. He decides to go back to stand-up comedy, an odd choice for a superstar comic with piles of movie offers on his kitchen counter, and winds up playing to silenced crowds at the Improv, who don’t get that his “How will you go on without me?” act isn’t really an act—he wants to know how America will go on without one of its icons. “Why me?” mixed with “You poor bastards.”

Meanwhile, Ira Wright (Seth Rogen) is an aspiring comedian who works at a grocery store and sleeps on his friend’s couch. His roommates, a more successful comic (Jonah Hill), and the star of an awful, teen-orientated sitcom (Jason Schwartzman), and his co-worker at the deli (RZA) all point out his fatal flaw: He isn’t funny. It’s sad, and perhaps lucky, that he has to go on after George, who just bombed. When his original material doesn’t go over so well, he starts ragging on George, who is looking on in the back sullenly.

George hires Ira to write jokes for him and eventually become his assistant. For Ira, it’s a dream job. He gets to open for George, hang out in a massive house, and get paid to write material for stand-up comedy. For George, it’s a necessity. Ira is the first person in some time he has let into his life, the first person to realize how crushing his lonely existence is, and the first person to find out that he has cancer.

From there, the movie changes gears. It becomes less about funny people and more about the process of finding oneself. George has a lot of soul-searching to do, and, unlike 99% of movie characters who go through his situation, he isn’t very good at it. Sure, things seem to be moving along while he’s sick, but what’s to stop George Simmons from going back to being a jerk when he’s healthy?

Nothing, which is why he becomes a celebrimonster as soon as the doctor (Torsten Voges) tells him to go out and make another movie. Rather than do that, George wants to pursue Laura (Leslie Mann), the woman he would have married had not he cheated on her. The problem with that plan of action is that Laura is married to Clark (Eric Bana) and has two kids. He has a choice: Make himself happy and destroy a family, or look for happiness elsewhere.

If that’s what you expected to see going in, more power to you. You were clearly paying attention during Knocked Up, The 40 Year Old Virgin, Superbad, Forgetting Sarah Marshal, or any of Judd Apatow’s TV shows. If you were expecting an Adam McKay-like parade of dick, fart, and masturbation jokes with nothing else, you might walk out a little nonplussed. “Funny People?” you might ask. “Was I supposed to laugh when Sarah Silverman made her face look like a vagina, or was Judd just fucking with me?”

Well no, probably not. The people making the trailers are likely to blame, not that the Comedy Central stand-up special helped any. Any time two comedians are in the same room in this movie, there is some kind of awkwardness, an invisible competition running between the two, and an odd, mutual loathing. The jokes they crack offstage are often not funny, they don’t look happy shaking hands and taking pictures with people they don’t know, and, you may be shocked, the big guys hire open mic night people to write jokes for them. Only Eminem seems to get it, but if he believes what he’s saying, every new release is the highest form of cowardice. It’s all an act, even when it isn’t.

I—like most people, I imagine—liked the first half of Funny People more than the second. While I won’t go out on a limb and call Apatow indulgent for putting his wife and kids front and center, I do wonder at why two radically different movies were smashed together, pushing an extremely likable Seth Rogen so far into the background that, at one point, he is told to go watch a movie with the kids…which he does without protest.

Stand-up comedy is a heavily veiled world that few ever get a peek at, and Apatow went with a brilliant set-up to give the audience a chance to see where our favorite stand-ups got their start. It’s unique. It’s fresh. Marital drama, no matter how well it’s executed, seems a bit dull by comparison. The tacked-on ending helps neither half of the movie.

That doesn’t mean that Funny People isn’t a film without a lot to say. If anything, it has too much to say and spends too much time finding the words. While it might go unappreciated now because August is the month usually dedicated to Sandler fare like You Don’t Mess With the Zohan, this is a challenging, sometimes brilliant movie waiting to be picked up and appreciated by people who want something beyond the dick and fart jokes. This is no minor entry in Apatow’s canon.

Rating:

Funny People. Directed by Judd Apatow. With Adam Sandler (George Simmons), Seth Rogen (Ira Wright), Leslie Mann (Laura), Eric Bana (Clarke), Jonah Hill (Leo), Jason Schwartzman (Mark), Aubrey Plaza (Daisy), RZA (Chuck), and Aziz Ansari (Randy). Released July 31, 2009, by Universal Pictures.

Movie Review: Star Trek (2009)

Sometime around four months ago, my mom and I stopped into Blockbuster Video, looking for something to pass the time. The problem with Blockbuster Video, at least in my estimation, is that their emphasis on stocking 345 copies of the latest Matthew McConaughey movie really limits their ability to have a good back catalog. That night, there was absolutely nothing to rent, so my mom, indignant that I’d never seen a lick of Star Trek, picked up a copy of Star Trek: The Motion Picture and headed to the counter. On the way home, she described the experience for me:

“When they showed Kirk, the whole movie stopped to allow the people in the theater to cheer,” she said.

“The whole movie?”

“Yes,” she nodded, “and then they did it for Bones, for the ship, for Spock…”

I was very impressed by all of this. As a lifelong Star Wars fan, I understood fandom for specific characters, but even so, not even the cult of Boba Fett could defend his cameo/mugging in the special edition of A New Hope. Trekkies, I surmised, had to be the most dedicated fans there were—dedicated enough to admit their obsession to Stanley Kubrick without a hint of embarrassment.

Boy was I disappointed. While the special effects were great (for 1979), I couldn’t wrap my head around it. About an hour in, my mom had to admit how boring the movie was. At the end, when the dad from 7th Heaven merged with a satellite and some bald chick, even she couldn’t see why everybody thought it was so damned exciting.

Wrath of Khan is much better,” she assured me.

I never saw Wrath of Khan, but after watching Star Trek, I suspect I will.

I know that this is a reboot (not technically, but it’s still too early for spoilers), so J.J. Abrams’ vision of the franchise should really have no bearing on how I look at the previous 40 years of television, film, books, comics, and merchandise, but it does. To a Trek outsider, this is a perfect introduction.

Abrams’ film, while containing many winks and nods to the original series (a terribly CGI’d green skinned woman, awful accents, the delivery of Bones McCoy’s dialog), goes for spectacle, for speed, for kinetic, frenzied action. It delivers, and, in doing so, marks a departure from a series that was known as much for its cheap rubber suits as its human drama.

The first Trek film’s problem was that it focused on spectacle, trying in vain to compete with Star Wars, which relished in the possibilities presented by different planets and races, but never paused to let the viewer know that this was a different world. Star Trek ignores the issue by going 120 miles an hour from the opening minute—there is little time to stop and marvel at the Enterprise.

If that seems a bit at odds with the original series, well, it is. Chalk it up to this movie being made for the benefit of a new generation who don’t have time for calm, considered plots, captain’s logs, dramatic line readings, or slow-as-molasses fight scenes, but shifting the franchise into full blown space opera mode turns out to be a good decision—the final effort is worth more than the three Star Wars prequels combined.

The movie stumbles at points—I never expected to see Sulu draw a sword, for example, let alone expect him to fight like an expert in kung-fu—but it’s fun, and it gets enough of the old stuff right while moving the franchise in a new direction…one that may make possible a future where sci-fi isn’t a target of sad jokes.

To be honest, I wasn’t sure that Abrams could pull it off. I don’t watch much TV, haven’t seen an episode of Lost or Alias and have walked out from many of his movies (Mission: Impossible 3, Cloverfield) feeling that the hype surrounding him was unwarranted.

While Star Trek is far from perfect, it shows Abrams ability to balance the demands of fandom and the demands of his audience. There is plenty of style on display, and enough substance to keep it going. For every moment he gets wrong, there are plenty of moments where everything feels right. Considering the way many of 2009′s reboots are going, you could do a lot worse.

Rating:

Star Trek. Directed by J.J. Abrams. With Chris Pine (Kirk), Zachary Quinto (Spock), Leonard Nimoy (Spock Prime), Eric Bana (Nero), Bruce Greenwood (Pike), Karl Urban (Bones), Zoë Saldana (Uhura), and Simon Pegg (Scotty). Released May 8, 2009, by Paramount Pictures.